Ifo Institute takes a critical view of the German government's new industrial strategy

This is the press release from the German think-tank Ifo Institute:

The ifo Institute takes a critical view of the German government's new industrial strategy. "This industrial strategy harbors dangers and neglects the special conditions of Germany as a business location," says ifo President Clemens Fuest. "The orientation towards China's industrial policy is misleading because China is still a country that is catching up technically in many sectors. An investment steering industrial policy with a strong export orientation can accelerate this development." The ifo researcher Oliver Falck says: "German industry, on the other hand, is moving at the global technology frontier. Research on industrial policy strategies shows that in such a situation fierce competition and pressure to change are far more important for success, especially for large companies.“

It is positive that the German government is committed to maintaining the competitiveness of Germany as an industrial location, for example through the tax system, Fuest continues. It is also right to take into account the consequences of technological change and the industrial policies of other countries, especially China. "But protecting large German companies from takeovers and facilitating large-scale mergers would reduce competitive pressure and the pressure to innovate and change in these companies."

The emphasis that the size of companies is important for their competitiveness is problematic. "The global success of the German economy is based precisely on the success of the 'hidden champions', who achieve competitive advantages not through size but through flexibility and a high degree of specialisation," says Fuest. The steering of investments to specific projects where market failures are not apparent, such as mass production of battery cells in Germany, entails the danger of resource misdirection and distortions of competition to the detriment of other companies in Germany. Moreover, "the discussion about such subsidies will only lead to private investors waiting," says Fuest.

Share: Feed news

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.

If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.

FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.

The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.