SEC settles charges with Abra for $500 million unregistered securities sales after Ripple lawsuit

The US SEC settled charges with Abra, a firm that runs a crypto lending business, for the $500 million sale of unregistered securities.
In the Ripple case, the Judge ruled that the sale of XRP to institutions was a securities violation, but Abra chose to pay a civil penalty without admitting or denying the charges.
Pro-crypto attorney Bill Morgan says the SEC is less likely to appeal the Ripple ruling.

The US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) settled charges against Abra, a crypto lending platform, for allegedly having violated securities law after selling around $500 million via its Abra Earn product. This settlement marks an important development in the crypto regulatory landscape since Abra did not admit or deny the regulator’s allegations but agreed to pay civil penalties to be determined by the court.

In the Ripple lawsuit, the court determined that the payment-remittance firm violated securities law through the sale of unregistered securities to institutional investors. Pro-crypto lawyers shared their thoughts on the likelihood of the regulator appealing the final ruling in the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit.

The difference between the two enforcement actions by the SEC shows what crypto traders in the US can expect from the changing regulatory landscape.

Abra does not admit or deny SEC allegations

Abra is a crypto platform that settled charges brought by the SEC against its Abra Earn product, according to a SEC statement published on Monday. Starting in 2020, the firm offered Abra Earn to customers and promised high returns in exchange.

The Abra Earn program had nearly $600 million in user assets, of which $500 million was from the US. The SEC’s press release states that Abra operated as an investment company without registration for at least two years.

The press release reads:

To settle the Commission’s charges, Abra, without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, has consented to an injunction prohibiting it from violating the registration provisions of the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act and requiring it to pay civil penalties in amounts to be determined by the court.

The presiding judge in the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit stated that the firm violated securities laws through institutional sales of XRP, unlike the SEC’s enforcement action against Abra. The firm has settled charges without admitting the allegations. Previously, Abra already settled charges in 2020, and paid $150,000 each to the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), putting an end to the investigation into its swaps product.

An Abra spokesperson told FXStreet:

“Plutus Lending LLC (“PLL”), a subsidiary of Abra, has agreed to settle an action brought by the SEC regarding Abra Earn, a service that was discontinued in 2022. Without admission of wrongdoing, PLL agrees to continue to comply with securities laws. No consumers were harmed at all by the settlement or wind down of Abra Earn. All assets for US Earn customers including accrued interest were transferred to their Abra Trade accounts in 2023. Abra continues to operate in the USA via Abra Capital Management, an SEC-registered investment advisor.”

SEC less likely to appeal Ripple ruling

Pro-crypto attorney Bill Morgan said that the SEC is less likely to appeal the final ruling in the Ripple lawsuit. Attorney Morgan noted that the judge is clear in the reasoning and compared the lawsuit with that of SEC lawsuits against Payward Inc. and Binance.

Very interesting case. I agree with you in part about the decision being positive for the SEC. The Judge is very clear in his reasoning. As a lawyer it is the sort of judgment you like to read.

As seems to be a habit with these decisions some of the juiciest parts are in the… https://t.co/PW4c3jDQwB pic.twitter.com/UkNnOqsPSY
— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) August 27, 2024

Share: Cryptos feed

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.

If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.

FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.

The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.