Today is PMI day
|Outlook
Today is PMI day, although the cement on the outlook for central banks is starting to dry, so perhaps without the usual effect on traders. And only one Fed speaker today (Atlanta Fed Bostic). We also get the usual Thursday unemployment report, ho hum. This PMI is the S&P version and expected to slip to 51 from 51.3 in April. The market prefers the ISM version, due later (manufacturing on June 1 and services on the 3rd).
Some analysts like to parse every word and punctuation mark in the Fed minutes and make a big deal out of an added (or deleted) word. Reuters writes the Fed minutes say this: "… various participants mentioned a willingness to tighten policy further should risks to inflation materialize in a way that such an action became appropriate." The modifier “various” is not usually used in the minutes and unlike the usual words (some, many, and most) conceals how many people we are talking about. We’d say “some” and “many” are equally ambiguous.
We are not sure focusing on “various” useful. It’s a bad use of time if we really believe the Fed is data-dependent. It should be obvious that if we got a series of higher inflation numbers, the Fed would have to consider a hike. Kindly remember that word IF. Somebody saying, “Golly, we may have to hike” is just plain speculative. Besides, the meeting took place before we got the somewhat better April inflation data, taking out some of the sting of the Q1 data. A hawkish tilt given Q1 should not be a surprise.
If we want to know a professional interpretation, look to the 10-year. The high early in the day was 4.460%. By the close, it had dipped to 4.424%. Even the more sensitive 2-year started out early at 4.873% (from 4.880% at the previous close) and ended around 4.882%, or very little more than the previous close. In other words, those in the know, or rather those who think they know, were not impressed by the idea of a hike. It’s just an idea, not a forecast and not, so far, based on data.
Somewhat more impressive is that the Goldman Sachs CEO opining we won’t get any cuts this year. He points out that while the rate of inflation may be falling, prices are higher than two years ago and staying that way, starting to hit the average consumer, as seen in consumer company sales. It was only April that the Goldman economists had predicted two cuts this year. Separately, another top official said “the house doesn’t have a view” on cuts.
We hate to point it out, but we get the next inflation numbers on May 31, a week from tomorrow and after the long US weekend—and it’s the right data set for talking about the Fed, the PCE version. See the chart from Reuters. If we were to get another tick up, traders could well overreact and push the first cut out into the coming year, or firm up the idea of a hike. On the other hand, a nice drop would restore the idea of a Sept cut, taking it away from November. A Nov cut is, to our mind, out of the question, for all the reasons listed below.
Forecast
We expected to see dollar short-covering going into the Memorial Day weekend, but so far got only three days’ worth. Tomorrow may be a short day so that traders can make it a 3½-day or 4-day holiday, leaving a rallyette to today or not at all. The resilience of the euro is remarkable. All the same, we continue to expect a dip to about 1.0780, where the 20-day and 200-day moving averages converge near the cloud top. We are not calling it a tipping point, but everyone knows those levels. If met, a further drop to 1.0750 is likely. Be aware that this scenario could have more than a dollop of wishful thinking.
Reasons for the Fed to Cut Rates
Avoid embarrassment from getting inflation wrong twice
Normalize the yield curve
Head off any recessionary tendencies
Help housing via mortgage rates
Help banks rollover commercial property loans
Help the stock market
This is an excerpt from “The Rockefeller Morning Briefing,” which is far larger (about 10 pages). The Briefing has been published every day for over 25 years and represents experienced analysis and insight. The report offers deep background and is not intended to guide FX trading. Rockefeller produces other reports (in spot and futures) for trading purposes.
To get a two-week trial of the full reports plus traders advice for only $3.95. Click here!
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.