Ripple lawyer calls Gary Gensler a “bad faith regulator” as SEC approves Grayscale's Bitcoin Futures ETF
|- The SEC approved Grayscale's Bitcoin Futures ETF, growing the list of approvals, including BTC Short ETF and Leveraged ETF.
- The move sparked controversy over why the agency has disallowed a spot Bitcoin ETF, yet it offers lesser risks.
- Ripple lawyer deems Gensler a "bad faith regulator" as his predecessor Jay Clayton offered valuable insight.
Ripple lawyer and XRP proponent John E Deaton joins the Crypto Twitter community, which is in awe after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved Grayscale's leveraged Bitcoin Futures Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), giving the product the go-ahead to commence trading.
Ripple lawyer on BTC Futures ETF approval
Ripple lawyer John Deaton has called out SEC Chair Gary Gensler for operating in deception after the agency approved Grayscale's application for a Bitcoin Futures ETF. According to Deaton, Gensler is a "bad faith regulator."
I was wondering whether @Grayscale was going to do this. The @SECGov and @GaryGensler have approved a #Bitcoin Futures ETF, a #BTC Short ETF and a #BTC Leveraged ETF but denies a #BTC Spot ETF because it can be manipulated. Genlser is a bad faith regulator. Period. https://t.co/sQ9tO3HYG6
— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) July 10, 2023
I was wondering whether @Grayscale was going to do this. The @SECGov and @GaryGensler have approved a #Bitcoin Futures ETF, a #BTC Short ETF and a #BTC Leveraged ETF but denies a #BTC Spot ETF because it can be manipulated. Genlser is a bad faith regulator. Period. https://t.co/sQ9tO3HYG6
— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) July 10, 2023
Notably, Grayscale is the plaintiff in a case that began on June 29, 2022, against the SEC after the agency turned an application to change GBTC, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, to a Spot BTC ETP. Notably, an ETP is how the Grayscale camp refers to an ETF.
According to Grayscale, the regulator randomly established that the proposal to list and trade the trust's shares was not clear-cut to prevent manipulation and fraud. This is despite the regulator approving BTC Futures ETFs with exactly the same susceptibilities to manipulation and fraud.
Citing Grayscale lawyer Donald B. Verrilli, who is reportedly very good at his job, in the July 10, 2023 appeal to the court:
...As a result, it exposes investors to an even riskier investment product than traditional bitcoin futures exchange-traded products..
Grayscale's lawyer just submitted a letter today to the judge in their case about the 2x Bitcoin Futures ETF $BITX being approved and how that just adds to their case about how the hell can that exist and not a vanilla spot etf? pic.twitter.com/6F9Zd7Wrfq
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) July 10, 2023
Grayscale's lawyer just submitted a letter today to the judge in their case about the 2x Bitcoin Futures ETF $BITX being approved and how that just adds to their case about how the hell can that exist and not a vanilla spot etf? pic.twitter.com/6F9Zd7Wrfq
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) July 10, 2023
Leveraging the recent developments for its 2022 case, Grayscale BTC Futures ETFs approval adds weight to the current spot Bitcoin ETF mania, with several firms re-filing after the first series of disapprovals. Notably, the argument hinges on the fact that the value of Bitcoin Futures ETFs sources from the underlying asset (BTC). In the past, the regulator used this perspective to deny a spot BTC filing.
I prefer highlighting this part.
— Erica Woods ♀️️ (@fewture) July 10, 2023
The value is derived from the underlying asset, which the SEC has previously argued for spot happens on unregulated exchanges of insufficient size.
However, they approve that valuation methodology for futures and leveraged futures products.
pic.twitter.com/axFjbpMNJV
I prefer highlighting this part.
— Erica Woods ♀️️ (@fewture) July 10, 2023
The value is derived from the underlying asset, which the SEC has previously argued for spot happens on unregulated exchanges of insufficient size.
However, they approve that valuation methodology for futures and leveraged futures products.
pic.twitter.com/axFjbpMNJV
As such, Grayscale argues that …" [the 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF] is exposed to even more risks of the Bitcoin markets than Grayscale's proposed spot bitcoin ETP."
According to Deaton, it is a show of "bad faith" that the plaintiff refuses to approve a Bitcoin spot ETF on the grounds of susceptibility to manipulation, yet the same agency approved a Bitcoin Futures ETF, a BTC Short ETF, and a BTC Leveraged ETF which bear somewhat similar risks.
SEC at crossroads, three possible outcomes
As Grayscale pushes for the court to identify the "unfairness," the agency finds itself at crossroads, but Grayscale's chief legal officer Craig Salm offers three possible outcomes.
First, they could approve the previous Grayscale application to convert GBTC to spot BTC ETFs and move ahead to approve the current Spot Bitcoin ETF filings.
Secondly, Salm proposes that the agency configures another excuse for turning down Spot BTC ETFs, and thirdly, they should consider beginning to treat spot and Futures Bitcoin ETFs the same way. To do this, it would require that the entire BTC Futures ETFs be restructured.
Two out of the three proposals by Salm seem highly unlikely, which means that the outcome likely to occur is that the Fed will permit the proposed spot BTC ETFs to start trading, a move that could put out speculation that the agency is biased and see the likes of BlackRock, Fidelity, Valkyrie, Ark Invest and others roll out their products.
FXStreet will bring you updates on whichever option the SEC goes with, if any.
Meanwhile, former chair of the SEC, Jay Clayton has offered value-adding insight that could help institutional finance players get the Spot Bitcoin ETF filings approved. Read that here Former SEC Chair says it would be difficult to deny approval of spot Bitcoin ETF if efficacy is demonstrated
Like this article? Help us with some feedback by answering this survey:
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.