Coinbase ex-employee and brother settle insider trading charges with US SEC
|- Ex-Coinbase product manager Ishan Wahi and his brother Nikhil Wahi have agreed to settle insider trading charges filed by the SEC.
- They were accused of leveraging the knowledge of "at least" nine cryptos set for listing on Coinbase in the future.
- Reportedly, the SEC has filed a motion for final judgment in the US District Court of the Western District of Washington.
Coinbase (COIN) exchange's former product manager Ishan Wahi and his brother Nikhil Wahi have agreed to settle insider trading charges filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),eight weeks after reaching an"in-principle agreement to resolve the case.
Also read: Coinbase former employee reaches ‘in principle agreement’ with SEC to resolve insider trading case
Coinbase exchange’s Wahi brothers settle with SEC
Coinbase exchange’s Wahi brothers have reached a settlement with the SEC in insider trading charges, according to a May 30 announcement. The development comes after the agency filed a motion for final judgment in the US District Court of the Western District of Washington.
As reported in April, Ishan and Nikhil Wahi were accused of insider trading in a case filed on July 21, 2022, by the SEC and the Department of Justice (DOJ). However, in the April 2023 update, it was revealed that the SEC had reached “an agreement in principle” with former Coinbase product manager Ishan Wahi, who had been sentenced to two years in prison by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 9. The sentences came after it was determined that Wahi had made up to $1.5 million through illegal trading. His brother, Nikhil, was sentenced to ten months imprisonment in January 2023 by the same court.
SEC lawsuit against the Wahi brothers
According to the agency’s lawsuit, the Wahi brothers and a third defendant, Sameer Ramani, had traded in crypto asset securities. An excerpt from the filing reads:
They [Wahi brothers] used knowledge of at least nine crypto assets that would be listed on Coinbase in the future to purchase before listing.
The allegation fueled much controversy, with commissioner Caroline Pham of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) calling the SEC’s actions “regulation by enforcement” and warning that:
Classifying tokens “that could be described as utility tokens and/or certain tokens relating to decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) could have implications beyond this single case.
The Wahis had filed a motion to dismiss the case in February on the grounds that the SEC wrongly classified the tokens in question in the case. The brothers based their argument on the Howey test and major questions doctrine.
SEC v. Wahi is the first case that directly asks a judge to weigh the major questions doctrine in a crypto matter.https://t.co/ha7L9M1mBM
— Bloomberg Law (@BLaw) February 16, 2023
SEC v. Wahi is the first case that directly asks a judge to weigh the major questions doctrine in a crypto matter.https://t.co/ha7L9M1mBM
— Bloomberg Law (@BLaw) February 16, 2023
Notably, the major questions doctrine says an agency cannot bring about a major policy without clear statutory authorization.
SEC and Wahi brothers reach a settlement
However, in the latest development, the two have reached a settlement.
The @SECGov just entered a proposed settlement in their case against Ishan Wahi, the former Coinbase employee, which is a complete surrender and shows the weakness in the SEC's theories about secondary market trading of crypto
— Rodrigo (@RSSH273) May 30, 2023
This is a meaningful development for the industry
The @SECGov just entered a proposed settlement in their case against Ishan Wahi, the former Coinbase employee, which is a complete surrender and shows the weakness in the SEC's theories about secondary market trading of crypto
— Rodrigo (@RSSH273) May 30, 2023
This is a meaningful development for the industry
SEC’s Division of Enforcement director Gurbir S. Grewal says, “While the technologies at issue, in this case, maybe new, the conduct is not. […] The federal securities laws do not exempt crypto asset securities from the prohibition against insider trading, nor does the SEC.” He added:
We allege that Ishan and Nikhil Wahi, respectively, tipped and traded securities based on material nonpublic information, and that’s insider trading, pure and simple. The federal securities laws do not exempt crypto asset securities from the prohibition against insider trading, nor does the SEC. I am grateful to the SEC staff for successfully working to resolve this matter.
Notably, the settlement remains subject to court approval. If it passes, the justifiability of the regulator’s claims will not be decided. This means that the settlement puts an end to the court case, which was set to answer the question of “whether the nine of the cryptocurrencies at the heart of the case were indeed securities,” as the SEC claimed.
Notably, in his initial response to the SEC case, Ishan Wahi insisted that those tokens were not securities.
Wahi pled guilty to DOJ charges and settled, but strongly contested SEC charges@paradigm filed a brief supporting Wahi's defense against SEC, arguing the tokens could not be deemed securities even if they were initially sold in securities transactionshttps://t.co/sTan1tHNYn
— Rodrigo (@RSSH273) May 30, 2023
Wahi pled guilty to DOJ charges and settled, but strongly contested SEC charges@paradigm filed a brief supporting Wahi's defense against SEC, arguing the tokens could not be deemed securities even if they were initially sold in securities transactionshttps://t.co/sTan1tHNYn
— Rodrigo (@RSSH273) May 30, 2023
More on Coinbase: Coinbase Layer-2 Base readies for mainnet launch with no plans for network token
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.