Coinbase CLO wants case with the US SEC left to Congress
|- Coinbase has expressed confidence in its legal arguments amid ongoing legal battle against US SEC.
- According to Coinbase’s CLO, the SEC is unable to unilaterally expand and redefine its own regulatory ambit.
- With this, the Coinbase executive wants the matter left to Congress, including ongoing legislative discussions about regulatory frameworks.
Coinbase exchange’s case against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is on, with the presiding judge, Katherine Polk Failla trying to determine whether securities law applies to listings. The ruling will depend on whether the transactions in any of the twelve cryptocurrency tokens should be classified as an unregistered security.
Coinbase seeks to throw SEC’s case that its breaking the law
In December, Coinbase had declared commitment to challenge the SEC’s abdication of duty after the financial regulator denied petition for cryptocurrency rules. Among the reasons for the denial, according to a statement by SEC chair Gary Gensler, include:
- There being existing laws and regulations already, which apply to the crypto securities markets.
- That the SEC addresses the crypto securities markets through rulemaking as well.
- It is important to maintain Commission discretion regarding rulemaking priorities.
Fast forward to Wednesday, January 17, the two parties appeared in court before Judge Failla, with the SEC pushing that Coinbase had broken securities laws. On the other desk, Coinbase lawyers defended that the said tokens were secondary-market trades with no contract in place, meaning they could not be securities.
The presentations by the plaintiff and the defendant culminated in Judge Failla deciding against making a decision from the bench. Her decision is expected in the coming weeks.
Coinbase CLO calls out the SEC
In a recent post on X, Coinbase chief legal officer (CLO) Paul Grewal has called out the SEC for continually claiming broad authority over all investments while offering no limiting principle to its definition of an investment contract.
Today we made arguments in our motion to bounce the @SECgov suit against @Coinbase. After hours and hours, this much remain clear: the SEC continues to claim broad authority over all investments while offering no limiting principle to its definition of investment contract. 1/4
— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) January 17, 2024
Today we made arguments in our motion to bounce the @SECgov suit against @Coinbase. After hours and hours, this much remain clear: the SEC continues to claim broad authority over all investments while offering no limiting principle to its definition of investment contract. 1/4
— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) January 17, 2024
According to the Coinbase executive, the SEC is unable to “unilaterally expand and redefine its own regulatory ambit”. With this, Grewal wants the matter to be left to Congress, including the ongoing legislative discussions about regulatory frameworks that are currently taking place.
The Coinbase CLO also articulated, “Coinbase does not offer securities,” reassuring confidence in the company’s legal arguments while expressing optimism for a decision that will bring much needed clarity to the industry.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.