US June Nonfarm Payrolls Preview: Analyzing gold's reaction to NFP surprises
Premium|Take advantage of 60% OFF on your first month.
Grab this special offer, it's 7 months for FREE deal! And access ALL our articles and analysis.
You have reached your limit of 5 free articles for this month.
BLACK FRIDAY SALE! 60% OFF!
Grab this special offer, it's 7 months for FREE deal! And access ALL our articles and analysis.
CLAIM OFFER- Nonfarm Payrolls in US is forecast to increase by 270,000 in June.
- Gold is likely to react more significantly to a disappointing jobs report than an upbeat one.
- Gold's movement has no apparent connection with NFP deviation four hours after the release.
Historically, how impactful has the US jobs report been on gold’s valuation? In this article, we present results from a study in which we analyzed the XAUUSD pair's reaction to the previous 23 NFP prints*.
We present our findings as the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) gets ready to release the June jobs report on Friday, July 8. Expectations are for a 270,000 rise in Nonfarm Payrolls following the 390,000 increase in May.
*We omitted the NFP data for March 2021, which was published on the first Friday of April, due to lack of volatility amid Easter Friday.
Methodology
We plotted gold price’s reaction to the NFP release at 15 minutes, one hour and four hours intervals after the release. Then we compared the gold price reaction to the deviation between the actual NFP release result and the expected result.
We used the FXStreet Economic Calendar for data on deviation as it assigns a deviation point to each macroeconomic data release to show how big the divergence was between the actual print and the market consensus. For instance, the August (2021) NFP data missed the market expectation of 750,000 by a wide margin and the deviation was -1.49. On the other hand, February’s (2021) NFP print of 536,000 against the market expectation of 182,000 was a positive surprise with the deviation posting 1.76 for that particular release. A better-than-expected NFP print is seen as a USD-positive development and vice versa.
Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficient (r) to figure out at which time frame gold had the strongest correlation with an NFP surprise. When r approaches -1, it suggests there is a significant negative correlation, while a significant positive correlation is identified when r moves toward 1. Since gold is defined as XAU/USD, an upbeat NFP reading should cause it to edge lower and point to a negative correlation.
Results
There were 12 negative and 11 positive NFP surprises in the previous 23 releases, excluding data for March 2021. On average, the deviation was -0.86 on disappointing prints and 0.58 on strong figures. 15 minutes after the release, gold moved up by $3.97 on average if the NFP reading fell short of market consensus. On the flip side, gold declined by $1.75 on average on positive surprises. This finding suggests that investors’ immediate reaction is likely to be more significant to a disappointing print.
However, the correlation coefficients we calculated for the different time frames mentioned above don’t even come close to being significant. The strongest negative correlation is seen 15 minutes after the releases with the r standing at -0.49. One hour after the release, the correlation weakens with the r rising to -0.31 and there is virtually no correlation to speak of four hours after the release with the r approaching 0.
Several factors could be coming into play to weaken gold’s correlation with NFP surprises. A few hours after the NFP release on Friday, investors could look to book their profits toward the London fix, causing gold to reverse its direction after the initial reaction. Additionally, FOMC policymakers made it clear that they will remain focused on taming inflation and that they are not concerned about the labour market, possibly causing the market reaction to the headline NFP to remain short-lived.
- Nonfarm Payrolls in US is forecast to increase by 270,000 in June.
- Gold is likely to react more significantly to a disappointing jobs report than an upbeat one.
- Gold's movement has no apparent connection with NFP deviation four hours after the release.
Historically, how impactful has the US jobs report been on gold’s valuation? In this article, we present results from a study in which we analyzed the XAUUSD pair's reaction to the previous 23 NFP prints*.
We present our findings as the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) gets ready to release the June jobs report on Friday, July 8. Expectations are for a 270,000 rise in Nonfarm Payrolls following the 390,000 increase in May.
*We omitted the NFP data for March 2021, which was published on the first Friday of April, due to lack of volatility amid Easter Friday.
Methodology
We plotted gold price’s reaction to the NFP release at 15 minutes, one hour and four hours intervals after the release. Then we compared the gold price reaction to the deviation between the actual NFP release result and the expected result.
We used the FXStreet Economic Calendar for data on deviation as it assigns a deviation point to each macroeconomic data release to show how big the divergence was between the actual print and the market consensus. For instance, the August (2021) NFP data missed the market expectation of 750,000 by a wide margin and the deviation was -1.49. On the other hand, February’s (2021) NFP print of 536,000 against the market expectation of 182,000 was a positive surprise with the deviation posting 1.76 for that particular release. A better-than-expected NFP print is seen as a USD-positive development and vice versa.
Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficient (r) to figure out at which time frame gold had the strongest correlation with an NFP surprise. When r approaches -1, it suggests there is a significant negative correlation, while a significant positive correlation is identified when r moves toward 1. Since gold is defined as XAU/USD, an upbeat NFP reading should cause it to edge lower and point to a negative correlation.
Results
There were 12 negative and 11 positive NFP surprises in the previous 23 releases, excluding data for March 2021. On average, the deviation was -0.86 on disappointing prints and 0.58 on strong figures. 15 minutes after the release, gold moved up by $3.97 on average if the NFP reading fell short of market consensus. On the flip side, gold declined by $1.75 on average on positive surprises. This finding suggests that investors’ immediate reaction is likely to be more significant to a disappointing print.
However, the correlation coefficients we calculated for the different time frames mentioned above don’t even come close to being significant. The strongest negative correlation is seen 15 minutes after the releases with the r standing at -0.49. One hour after the release, the correlation weakens with the r rising to -0.31 and there is virtually no correlation to speak of four hours after the release with the r approaching 0.
Several factors could be coming into play to weaken gold’s correlation with NFP surprises. A few hours after the NFP release on Friday, investors could look to book their profits toward the London fix, causing gold to reverse its direction after the initial reaction. Additionally, FOMC policymakers made it clear that they will remain focused on taming inflation and that they are not concerned about the labour market, possibly causing the market reaction to the headline NFP to remain short-lived.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.