US and Eurozone: Facts, stylised facts and sentiment
|Historical relationships between economic data play a key role in shaping expectations. In the US, the Sahm rule is such an important stylised fact: when the recent increase in the unemployment rate reaches a certain threshold, a recession tends to follow shortly or has even already begun. The jobs report published early August showed that this critical value had been reached, triggering a drop in investor sentiment. At the Jackson Hole conference, Jerome Powell explained that the Fed’s focus is shifting to the labour market and brought an unambiguous message that the rate cutting cycle is to start in September. In the Eurozone, the negative relationship between companies’ employment expectations and households’ unemployment expectations over the next 12 months is an important stylised fact, so it was a relief to see that in August the former increased after several months of decline, although the latter worsened slightly. Unemployment expectations and the inflation outlook are highly correlated with household expectations about their financial situation, which in turn influences consumer spending. As disinflation continues, the focus of analysts and the ECB should gradually shift to the labour market, like is already the case in the US.
August often sees a bout of increased market volatility. This was again the case this year, following the disappointing US labour market data and the surprise decision by the Bank of Japan to hike its policy rate as well as its guidance that more tightening will follow. Although markets recovered quite rapidly thereafter, the events -especially those in the US- are a reminder of the crucial interaction between facts -economic data-, stylised facts -the historical relationship between economic data and between these data and market developments- and sentiment. Bad economic news can trigger a drop in sentiment, which in turn could cause future data to show more weakness if historically a close link has been established between such data and the economy in general. It illustrates the risk of a self-reinforcing negative spiral (self-fulfilling pessimism as described by Susan Collins, Boston Federal Reserve president).
Early August, the observation that the US unemployment rate had increased for the fourth month in a row, reaching 4.3%, had raised concerns about a looming recession risk because the threshold of the ‘Sahm rule’ had been broken. This ‘rule’ is a textbook example of a stylised fact. Historically, when the unemployment rate has moved above the threshold, it marks the start of a recession. However, one should not see this as a foolproof signal. Rather, it forces us to look even more diligently to any evidence that would point in this direction. This is also what the Federal Reserve is doing. Speaking at the Jackson Hole conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell insisted that “the economy continues to grow at a solid pace. But the inflation and labor market data show an evolving situation. The upside risks to inflation have diminished. And the downside risks to employment have increased.” It was an unambiguous message that the rate cutting cycle is to start at the FOMC’s meeting on 17-18 September, with the pace of further reductions dependent on the data and especially the labour market data. The Eurozone also has its stylised facts. An important one at the current juncture is the relationship between the employment expectations of companies and households’ unemployment expectations over the next 12 months. As shown in Chart 1, when the former decline, the latter tend to increase. Although unemployment expectations are not part of the European Commission’s consumer confidence index, there could still be an influence on household spending.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.