Understanding the true job shortage and why it's happening
|There's far more than meets the eye when it comes to employment levels and the unemployment rate. Nonfarm Payrolls and Employment, data from BLS, chart by Mish. Sometime this year, possibly as soon as the April or May jobs data, nonfarm payrolls and the employment level will exceed the pre-pandemic, February 2020 levels. However, there is a big structural deficit in jobs and employment because population does not stand still. We can calculate the structural deficit based on existing trend lines in jobs and employment. Where's the deficit coming from? To answer that question, we need to understand participation rates and population demographics by age group. The participation rate is defined as the number of people ages 16 and older who are employed or actively seeking employment, divided by the total non-institutionalized, civilian working-age population. Non-institutionalized means not in prison, a hospital, nursing home, etc. Labor Force Participation Rates data from BLS, chart by Mish I used Seasonally-Adjusted (SA) numbers where available and not adjusted (NSA) otherwise. Seasonal adjustments are more important for younger groups (think school). In general, the participation rates have been trending lower except for age groups 60 and older. I expect the participation rate of 65+ has peaked and that will soon head much lower. To better understand what's happening let's compare pre-pandemic number to March of 2022. Labor Force Participation Rates data from BLS, chart by Mish To understand what the declines in rates mean we need to look at population changes. Population data from BLS, chart by Mish The population of various most age groups is little changed except for age group 65+. Note the labor force participation rate of age group 65+ is 19.7 percent vs 82.5% for age group 25-54. Population data from BLS, chart by Mish Population data from BLS, calculation and chart by Mish Those moving from group 55-59 to 60-64 saw a participation rate change decline from 73.1 pre-pandemic to 57.6 in March of 2022. Those who moved from age group 60-64 saw a participation rate change decline from 57.7 pre-pandemic to 19.7 in March of 2022. At age 65, the rate does not immediately drop to 19.7 but to something higher. However the initial drop is very steep. At some age point he participation rate nears zero. That is the core working age group and the largest group as well. The seemingly small participation rate drop from 82.9% to 82.5% is significant when multiplied by 127.148 million people. 127.148 million * .004 = 508,592. Had the participation rate remained the same, another half-million people would be working in age group 25-59. Unemployment rate data from BLS, chart by Mish If the overall participation rate remained the same, the labor force and the unemployment level would both be another 4 to 5 million higher. Let's call it 4.5 million. One of my readers noted employment has grown much faster than payrolls. How much of the discrepancy is people selling stuff on eBay, which the BLS will say is employment even if someone makes no money. If the jobs picture is more accurate than the employment picture, then the shortage is greater. Other factors such as free money, drug abuse, and food stamps influence the desirability and ability to work. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) formerly Food Stamps. Data from USDA, chart by Mish. Pick your number of how this impacts desirability and need to work, but if you make it easy enough to not work, many will choose that route. Personal income and expenditures data from BEA, chart by Mish On April 22, I asked How Much Free Money Stimulus Still Hasn't Been Spent? I came up with one to two trillion dollars. What about eviction moratoriums? Again, pick your number of how this impacts desirability and need to work, but if you make it easy enough to not work, many will choose that route. Many workers retired, but many others dropped out of the labor force due to stimulus payments, eviction moratorium's, and stock market wealth impacts. Others suffered from drug abuse. Still others took advantage of SNAP and free money. Regardless of reason, the employment level is short 4-5 million workers based on the population increase and current demand for goods and services. Supply chain disruptions, sanctions, consumer preference changes, drug abuse, and additional demand from a stock market wealth boom all made matters worse. To curtail demand, the Fed needs to contain demand and one way is to crush the stock market wealth effect. So Expect More Stock Market Pain Because It's Coming But rate hikes have unwanted side effects such as also crushing home building while rents are still soaring. Rent is an inelastic demand and curtailing home building will add to the Fed's problems. The Fed is very much going to hate the latest bubble that it created.Chart notes
Structural deficit
Participation rate
Labor force participation rates March all years
Labor force participation rates pre-pandemic vs March 2022
Population March all years
Population pre-pandemic vs March 2022
Population change pre-pandemic vs March 2022
Key points
Age group 25-59
Unemployment rate
Calculation
Adjusted unemployment rate
Alcohol and drug abuse
Snap food stamp assistance
SNAP comparison
Free money
Summation
Expect more stock market pain because it's coming
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.