Rates spark: A strong temptation for the Fed to cut by 25bp
|The market is gunning for a 50bp cut. But could that juice equities? Is that what the Fed wants? Is there a need for a big cut? On balance, a contrarian 25bp cut could prove a bigger statement. In Europe, despite lower rates, the uptake of the ECB’s MRO liquidity facility remains low, reflecting ample reserves.
We're in the 25bp cut camp – But either way we brace for some potential upside to market rates
The market is urging the Federal Reserve to deliver a 50bp cut, now. It's not fully discounted, but on balance the market is more positioned for a 50bp cut than a 25bp cut. If the Fed delivers a 50bp cut it could be justified as the Fed getting ahead of the game and overdelivering on an underpriced 50bp cut. The counterargument is that a 50bp cut caves to the market call for a big cut. It could also juice the risk asset space, which while not awful, could present a mild irritation for the Fed.
Remember, rarely if ever has the Fed commenced a rate-cutting process with risk assets practically at their highs (or not far off)! Think about that, and what it infers.
Therein lies the argument for a 25bp cut. It's more measured. It does not give risk assets the juice craved. And in a way, it has the Fed taking back some control by deciding not to bow to the market pressure for a bigger cut. On balance, that's why we're in the 25bp cut camp. We can see the pendulum swinging in the direction of a 50bp cut. But in a way, a more measured 25bp move might just be enough for the Fed to make an even bigger statement than a 50bp move would.
On market rates, under delivery in the guise of a 25bp cut leaves market rates vulnerable to a move higher, as they are already pricing in quite some cuts ahead, and quite aggressively discounted up front, as can be gleaned from the 2yr yield at some 175bp through the funds rate; its deepest discount since the 1980s. In contrast, as a 50bp cut is not fully discounted, delivery should, theoretically, leave room for market rates to fall.
We have a sneaking suspicion though that we could see a “surprise” reaction higher in market rates to whatever the Fed does. It’s happened before. In fact, it’s running at about 50:50 on the reaction function historically. Why potentially higher post a cut? All of the excitement is ahead of the game. Delivery then brings a sense of new reality to the equation, which can see a tactical adjustment higher as an impact, even if structurally it's no more than a blip as rates ultimately re-test lower in subsequent weeks.
Limited uptake of ECB liquidity facility suggests ample reserves
Despite the cheapening of the ECB’s main liquidity facility since last week, the low uptake suggests that liquidity conditions are still ample in the eurozone. The ECB cut the deposit rate by 25bp, but the Main Refinancing Operations (MRO) rate was cut by a further 35bp, to just 15bp above the deposit rate. This was part of the broader operational review and should help prevent liquidity squeezes as bank reserves become scarcer due to quantitative tightening. The ECB reported that only €1.9bn was allotted among 29 bidders this week, which is actually on the low side compared to the numbers earlier this year (see chart below).
In contrast, the uptake of the short-term liquidity facility of the Bank of England has seen significant uptake since March and moved from around £1bn to the current £44bn in a matter of months. Also the spread between the policy rate and the market rate (Sterling Overnight Indexed Average) showed some tightening over this period. The pace of quantitative tightening has been relatively steeper in the UK, but nevertheless the tightening may be an omen of what is to come in the eurozone. Having said that, the tweak to the ECB’s MRO rate now provides a cheaper backstop in case of a sudden tightening of conditions, limiting the upside risk of market rates.
Limited ECB MRO uptake suggests ample liquidity in the banking system
Read the original analysis: Rates spark: A strong temptation for the Fed to cut by 25bp
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.